
ST. PAUL, Minn. (AP) — A Minnesota jury awarded $65.5 million on Friday to a mother of three who claimed talcum products made by Johnson & Johnson exposed her to asbestos and contributed to her developing cancer in the lining of her lungs.
Jurors determined that plaintiff Anna Jean Houghton Carley, 37, should be compensated by Johnson & Johnson after using its baby powder throughout her childhood and later developing mesothelioma, an aggressive cancer caused primarily by exposure to the carcinogen asbestos.
Johnson & Johnson said it would appeal the verdict.
During a 13-day trial in Ramsey County District Court, Carley's legal team argued the pharmaceutical giant sold and marketed talc-based products to consumers despite knowing it can be contaminated with asbestos. Carley's lawyers also said her family was never warned about potential dangers while using the product on their child. The product was taken off shelves in the U.S. in 2020.
“This case was not about compensation only. It was about truth and accountability," Carley's attorney Ben Braly said.
Erik Haas, worldwide vice president of litigation for Johnson & Johnson, argued the company's baby powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer. He expects an appellate court to reverse the decision.
The verdict is the latest development in a longstanding legal battle over claims that talc in Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower body powder was connected to ovarian cancer and mesothelioma, which strikes the lungs and other organs. Johnson & Johnson stopped selling powder made with talc worldwide in 2023.
“These lawsuits are predicated on ‘junk science,’ refuted by decades of studies that demonstrate Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer,” Haas said in a statement after the verdict.
Earlier this month, a Los Angeles jury awarded $40 million to two women who claimed Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder caused their ovarian cancer. And in October, another California jury ordered the company to pay $966 million to the family of a woman who died of mesothelioma, claiming she developed the cancer because the baby powder she used was contaminated with asbestos.
LATEST POSTS
- 1
Fact Check: Some Bridge Photos Circulating Do NOT Show The Hongqi Bridge That Collapsed In Southwest China Nov. 11, 2025 - 2
Explosions at Burundi ammunition depot kill civilians, witnesses say - 3
One of the best meteor showers of the year peaks at the worst possible time this week - 4
Weight-loss pill approval set to accelerate food industry product overhauls - 5
What an expert on the gut microbiome eats in a day
Flu activity rises sharply across US with 7.5 million cases, CDC data shows
Israel Police arrest twenty-one as anti-war protests grow despite broad support for Iran war
The Eastern Bongo, Kenya’s Rare Forest Antelope on the Brink
The most effective method to Alter Your Savvy Bed for A definitive Rest Insight
Poll: 62% of Americans would oppose U.S. military action in Greenland
Iranian missile hit on Ne'ot Hovav factory leads to fear of chemical leakage
Lilly, Novo lock horns in India's obesity drug race
Hoist Your Style: Famous Hairdos for Ladies
Inside the alleged Russian operation to trigger anti-government protests in Angola













